As it became clear, Mr. Obama won't scrap the tax cuts for richest as promised

Mr. Obama will spend at least another $700 billions in stimulus designed to keep afloat the financial sharks that helped his campaign (and to allow Mr. Wagoner to keep flying its corporate jet, as long as he promises to build environment friendly cars)

Mss. Clinton will head the US foreign policy - congrats again

No word about the promise to pull out from Iraq - that's good though, as it is clear that as long as the US pulls out the puppet Iraqu government will crumble and Islamic republic instated

On July 18 judge Sam Walker finally recused himself.

He set traps however.

The criminal case (me seen shopping in a Mall 3 weeks before Christmas) was transfered to Judge Rory Bellantoni.

Judge Bellantoni served for 9 months as a Law Clerk in the office of judge Sam Walker.

Judge Bellantoni  received monetary contributions for his electoral campaign by the attorney of my wife Neveen Nesheiwat.

On August 3 Judge Bellantony recused himself too.

Judge Walker "certified the divorce matter "ready for trial" in an order signed on August 2.

Well, Judge, it is not ready. The only discovery admitted by you since you started handling my divorce was the search of my MILLION DOLLAR portfolio by my wife's attorney.

It is quite a progress - now the lawyers of Mariya Basheva-Petrova know that the million is only in their client's dreams

On August 9, 2006 my divorce case (ready for trial) was assigned to Judge Robert Neary. Well Neveen Nesheiwat greased him well too - she has donated $750 for his electoral campaign.

The domestic violence industry is funded by taxpayer’s and fathers money. It is promoted by corrupt judges that funnel taxpayer's money to lawyers, psychiatrists and different programs.

Where and how to report a biased or corrupt judge

Don't leave the things as is. Don't be afraid. There must not be slavery in the 21 century. Be pro se. Report bias, corruption or incompetence (even if they won't listen to you).

Rest in Pease, Nicolae Bartha

a NY Post journalist called you demented, possibly from ignorance,

possibly because he was demented himself click here

How a "Liberal Judge" (in fact a true idiot on the judge's bench) got $3000 from my pocket

Judge Sam Walker managed to get from my pocket some $3000 under the pretext of "Condition of Bail" which went to the so called "Domestic Violence For Men" program.
I recently wrote a letter to Sam Walker, requesting him to return me this money (preferably from his salary, since the taxpayer should not pay for the scams of corrupt judges), but have not received an answer yet.

Here is my letter to the idiot:

Re: Index # 06-9329, Refund of the money that I paid to “Domestic Violence for Men” program
Attn: Judge Sam Walker, New York State Supreme Court
CC: Janet DiFiore, Westchester County DA for “People”, P. Haynes, Assistant DA

Dear Judge Walker,
As you certainly remember, during the period January 2006, August 2006 you were the Judge in the above captioned proceedings.
As you certainly remember, in January 2006 you imposed a so called additional “Condition of Bail” sanction to my bail release.
This “Condition of Bail” consisted of a “referral” to me to attend a “VCS Domestic Violence for Men” program for 52 weeks at the cost of $60 per week. I was forced to attend the Program under the threat to be jailed (I was refused jury trial for more than a year under various pretests, until such time “The Westchester Guardian” published a letter from me complaining about incredible harassment I was submitted too by the Westchester Judiciary; I was jailed for one day when I stopped to attend the Program).
As you certainly remember, you imposed this “Condition of Bail” being fully aware that no hearing of the parties had ever taken place in regards to the accusation of me being spotted in shopping center while having mutual orders of protection with the woman I was divorcing.
As you certainly remember, I rejected the accusation of violating the order of protection and pleaded non guilty.
As you certainly know a couple of days after The Westchester Guardian published my letter, a trial was scheduled and I was found non guilty by a jury.
During the 13 month period between the date you imposed the condition of bail in January 2006 and the time I was I was allowed to have a jury trial and was finally acquitted (February 2007) I spent approximately $3000 in program fees.
I respectfully ask you to reimburse me for the above mentioned amount. (I strongly believe you would arrange the matter in a way that the actual person who was responsible for this dissipation of my personal assets in violation of the US Constitution (The Presumption of Innocence) will have to pay the money and not the New Your taxpayer).
During the 50 weeks I attended this program I suffered incredible moral pain: I was taught that the fathers of this nation were “sexist”, that the main goal of the US Constitution is to oppress the poor, women, blacks and the different minorities, that every one in four men in the US is a child molester and other idiocies.
I do not ask you to compensate me for the moral pain I suffered.
I will gladly provide you audio recording of some of the sessions and if you are interested can arrange you to meet with victims of this programs, so that you become aware of what people think about the program that you once referred to as “Believe me, it’s good”.
Sincerely,
Peter Petrov,
October 23, 2007
White Plains, NY

Naturally, the idiot did not answer my letter. One useful tip to all those "abusers" who appear before Walker: Try staying as far as possible from Sam Walker during your court appearances. The guy sprinkles saliva when he talks.

To the NYS Commission on Judicial Conduct about Judge Robert A. Neary

Judge's Name: Robert Neary

Judge's Court: Supreme Court               County:   Westchester

Date(s) of Incident(s): 10/20/2006, 11/17/2006

Details of Complaint:

I’m Plaintiff in the divorce case (index #21006-05) and Honorable Robert Neary is the Judge.

Order granting attorney fees

On October 20, 2006 Judge Neary issued an oral order from the bench granting attorney fees w/o requiring any proof that the expenses actually occurred and stating that he “is not taking into consideration” the Defendant’s allegations that Plaintiff filed a blizzard of motions pro-se.

In a letter sent to Judge Neary immediately after the Court appearence, Plaintiff expressed his view that this order was not based on proper grounds and asked for a written version of this order so that he could appeal it.

On November 17 Judge Neary signed as is a proposed order prepared by Defendant’s attorney, stating as a ground for granting attorney fees the “fact” that “the petition filed by Plaintiff was the latest in a numerous collection of petitions filed before various judges” and that “the [attorney’s] fees [were] necessitated by the need to respond to the multitude of motions filed by Plaintiff”.

As such de facto Judge Neary accepted the allegations brought by Defendant which according to Hon. Neary’s own words he “does not take into consideration”.

I believe that Judge Neary’s sudden change in mind came because he desperately needed to state a ground for the written version of the oral order, which was not based on any ground. 

The facts indicate unequivocally that the sole criteria Hon. Neary was assigned to my matrimonial case was his ties to my wife’s attorney

In August 2006 as a result of the recusal Judge Sam Walker, my case was split to a criminal part and a matrimonial part.

The criminal and the matrimonial matters were assigned to the two judges who topped the Defendant’s attorney contribution list

The Defendant’s attorney Ms. Neveen Nesheiwat contributed respectively $5000 and $750 to Judge Rory Bellantoni and Judge Robert Neary election campaigns.

At the time of the assignment Judge Bellantoni and Judge Neary were not actively handling respectively criminal and matrimonial matters.

Judge Bellantoni recused himself as a result of my written request, Judge Neary refused.

During the first court appearance before Judge Neary, he dismissed outright and without any hearing my motion addressing the scandalous perjuries committed by the Defendant, probably with the help of her attorney Ms. Nesheiwat, who sponsored Hon. Neary in his election endeavors in 2004.

Among the perjuries, committed by my wife in sworn affidavits are the following allegations, which I wanted addressed ASAP:

-         that I transferred offshore $180,000 in order to evade taxation

-         that I own one million dollar financial portfolio (in my statement of net worth I claim a net worth of $140,000)

-         that I own $477,00 in stocks which I’m hiding

-         that I tried to throw my wife out of the moving vehicle while speeding on I-95

-         that I tried to strangle my wife in 2002 in an elevator in Karlsruhe, Germany

-         that I raped my wife in December 2002 in the presence of my son

-         …

Judge Neary refused to address the above perjuries in his Court and when contacted by the Westchester DA office, with whom I filed a complaint and requested investigation, influenced them, to decline any investigation on the matter.

Judge Neary’s ties with my wife’s attorney Ms. Neveen Nesheiwat are a public secret among the law professionals in Westchester County

Recently I contacted and interviewed four attorneys in an attempt to insure I’m represented during the premature trial Judge Neary scheduled for December 18.

All of them refused or asked me for extraordinary high retainers ranging from $25000 to $35000, a sum that I cannot afford. Thus even if I own highly liquid assets valued at more than $100,000 and the last day of the trial is scheduled by Hon. Neary to determining the attorney fees.

One of the attorneys I met was quite frank with me and told me that since “Neary is a man of Nesheiwat” he expected that judge Neary grants to Ms. Nesheiwat my portion of the marital assets in its entirety.

I can provide the list of the attorneys I contacted on request.

Complainant's Signature:     

Peter Petrov