Excellent logic, judge

09/25/07

Seven months ago I was maliciously accused in Domestic violence by my wife.

I believe that with the help of the guy she was dating - Montgomery Delaney, a personal injury lawyer in White Plains and ex Bronx cop, she set up an domestic violence incident.

On May 4 the charges against me were nolled by the Superior Court in Stamford, CT, because of lack of evidences.

Congratulations, you will say.

Well, guess what: The next day on May 5 Hon. Sam Walker from the Supreme Court in White Plains deprived me from the 4 hours a week parenting time with my 5-years old son who was taken away from me 7 months ago as a result of the same charges. Instead of having regular parenting time and custody as most fit parent, judge Walker directed me to a supervised visitation program, which means that I’ll be allowed at most to see my child for one and a half hour a week in the presence of a third person and only after I’m searched by a security guard.

The formal reason for Hon. Walker to do so was the fact that I missed one session from the so called [pretrial] “domestic violence program for men”. Despite the fact that I’m referred and not ordered to attend this idiocy and that even the rules of the program allow me to miss up to six sessions in a year.

Well, a month ago I was in non-compliance with the program – I decided that attending it was too big compromise with my intelligence and sense of fairness, but at that time Hon. Walker was more favorable to me: he expected me to lay a couple of golden eggs to the White Plains’ domestic violence industry – send a ten thousand dollar check to my wife’s “pro-bono” attorney as a retainer (usually retainers vary between $2000 and $5000),

pay another ten thousand to hire an attorney for me, pay an initial fee of $1800 to a forensic evaluation facility in Hartsdale, start paying a fat maintenance check to my wife - $2000 monthly.

And most important – I was expected to stop being pro-se and stop challenging the domestic violence industry and Hon. Walker with my uncultivated search for justice.

I did the opposite:

	I asked the head of the forensic evaluation program to Westchester Jewish Community Service if she can give me statistical info on the percentage custody recommendation to fathers versus mothers; I caught this lady lying to me.
	I called a taxpayer sponsored child abuse agency and complained that my son is stopped from the two schools that he used to attend six months ago. I complained of obvious signs of brainwashing over my son – as a result of this he developed a slight stammer. I complained that my son, who was communicative and fluent in English seven months ago, is no more able to express himself fluently in that language.
	I filed two complaints against judge Walker and I filed a notice of appeal for two of his most outrageous orders.
	Most important I remained pro-se since no attorney would agree to do the above without risking being disciplined or even disbarred by judge Walker or his mates.

I miscalculated how vindictive the judge and the industry can be (the law guardian of my son and my wife’s attorney, who by mistake missed the $10000 check) can be.

I’m fighting for custody of my 5-years old son

*I wrote in a letter to the head of White Plains YWCA Supervised Visitations Program that "I'll do everything possible to be able to see my child"; Hon Walker agreed with my wife's attorney that "everything possible" includes kidnapping. Excellent logic, judge! And what about terrorism? "Everything" does include everything.

Home

This site was last updated 08/31/06